The logic of the religious right and science has definitely reached an all-time, illogical level. The contradiction between Christian Nationalism and current government law has tangled itself into a state of carnal reprobation. This is thought-provoking because man overstepped God\u2019s natural law of giving life and stood on God\u2019s shoulders and decided he would be a giver of life himself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It is like the devil saying, “I am god, but if I do anything wrong I will put myself in hell.” This country cannot have the best of both worlds. You cannot server God and mammon.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Taking from God the biological properties of life and harnessing it into scientific laboratories, man has created a world within the spiritual realm of God, i.e., man has literally become a god of his own. Because he has done this, he cannot adopt the rules of God\u2019s realm all to his own because he has basically excluded God from the process of giving life.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Creating life and then religiously ruling on that life is equivalent to manipulating the weather by causing a hurricane on the coast and claiming it was an act of God so the victims can collect insurance money. You simply cannot use God\u2019s law to justify man\u2019s evolutionary misprints.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Therefore, the men today who are debating and making laws based on embryos must write and abide by his own laws, not God\u2019s. In other words, the rules of God about life and conception cannot apply to man\u2019s rules of the same. Conception, in the case of man is different than God\u2019s divine design of conception.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cIn 1979, a year after the world’s first IVF baby, the \u201ctest tube\u201d baby, was born, a coalition of anti-abortion groups denounced the new technology as “morally abhorrent” and persuaded the federal government to block funding for any research in which embryos were destroyed. But the number continued to rise as desperate families turned to IVF to conceive children. Today, about 2% of all babies born in the U.S. annually are conceived through IVF.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
History tells us that the initial reaction to test tube babies was a sense of moral rejection and repulsion, that man had now resorted to playing God by bringing forth life through scientific evolution instead of natural creation. Many people relied on common sense to come to this conclusion. It was simply unheard of.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
But as time went by, IVF became the norm, and people went about their lives and accepted it as the law of the land. Much like abortion. By law, embryos then were ruled by the government as property of those who froze them. \u201cBecause IVF was developed after Roe became the law of the land in 1973, embryos have typically been treated as private property that donors could implant, give away or have destroyed without consequence. But newly passed “personhood” laws pushed by conservatives and some religious groups are changing that.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
But see here is the problem. Religion or the church cannot have a hand in this because it is not an act of God but an invention of man, so let man set his own standards of life and death. He has already overstepped God so let him reap what is to come from this act of human evolution. This is more a private property issue than a life issue, thus it should be decided based on property laws, not biblical life or death laws.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In the case of the Alabama IVF ruling, the troops of Christian nationalism have been summoned and in comes the Bible and religious interference into science and government. This should be off limits to them because there is no way they can (or willfully) apply God\u2019s law to man\u2019s invention. By some form of self-righteousness, a Christian nationalist-backed judge came to the conclusion that the embryos were people and have the same rights as unborn babies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n